![]() ![]() I opened at random and my eye fell on p 382:ĭuchamp invented a category he called “infra-mince”, “sub-tiny” it was occupied, for instance, by the difference in weight between a clean shirt and the same shirt worn once. ![]() He moves the story forward in several broad themes – how art confronts or is absorbed by power what architecture thinks it’s doing to us the interior landscapes of art like surrealism and abstraction and how art has lost any kind of plot it thought it might have had, and if that might be a good thing. This book is the 1991 expanded version of the 1980 book-of-the-TV-series. “Machines were the ideal metaphor for that central pornographic fantasy of the 19th century, rape followed by gratitude.” “To make ‘socialist’ art, one must stop depicting ownable things: in short, go abstract.” “The idea that fascism always preferred retrograde to advanced art is simply a myth.” “Mass media took away the political speech of art.” In cubist paintings the world was “a twitching skin of nuances”. The phonograph was “the most radical extension of cultural memory since the photograph”. Viewing Paris from the Eiffel Tower in 1889 was “one of the pivots in human consciousness”. It’s stuffed full of ideas and sentences that refresh like a splash of seaspray. I think it’s the best single art book I’ve read. Again today I was lost in admiration of this history-with-attitude of 20th century art. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |